On this page

In short
- Respond.io bills by Monthly Active Contacts (MAC) with overage at $12 to $15 per 100 MACs; at 15,000+ contacts messaged a month that overage can dwarf the base subscription
- VGraple CRM bills a flat plan price with a fixed conversation limit, so the total is knowable in advance no matter how many contacts you reach
- Respond.io has a broader channel list (Telegram, Line, Viber) and a larger review base; VGraple CRM has no per-contact overage risk and includes a CRM pipeline on every plan
Verdict
Respond.io is a well-built, multi-channel conversation platform with a genuinely deep AI Agents product and a much larger customer base than VGraple CRM, but its Monthly Active Contact pricing model means the bill grows in a way that is hard to predict as your contact list scales, with overage running $12 to $15 per 100 contacts once you exceed a plan's included allowance. VGraple CRM bills a flat price per plan with a fixed conversation limit, so the total is knowable before you send anything, and it includes a CRM pipeline that respond.io does not have at all. Choose respond.io if you genuinely need Telegram, Line or Viber alongside WhatsApp and can absorb MAC overage at scale; choose VGraple CRM if predictable INR pricing and a built-in sales pipeline matter more.
Pricing
Respond.io's pricing page (respond.io/pricing, checked 26 Aug 2026) lists three self-serve tiers plus a custom Enterprise plan, billed on a Monthly Active Contacts (MAC) model with disclosed overage rates.

VGraple CRM vs Respond.io
VGraple CRMRespond.io
| Team size | VGraple CRM | Respond.io |
|---|---|---|
| 2 agents, 2,000 contacts messaged/month | Starter Rs 1,499 + Meta Rs 1,726 = Rs 3,225/month | Starter $79 (Rs 6,952, unlimited MAC on this tier per its pricing page) + Meta Rs 1,726 = Rs 8,678/month |
| 8 agents, 15,000 contacts messaged/month | Scale Rs 7,999 + Meta Rs 12,947 = Rs 20,946/month | Growth $159 (Rs 13,992) + 14,000 MAC overage x $12/100 = $1,680 (Rs 147,840) + Meta Rs 12,947 = ~Rs 174,779/month |
| 20 agents, 50,000 contacts messaged/month | Scale Rs 7,999 + Meta Rs 43,155 = Rs 51,154/month | Advanced $279 (Rs 24,552) + 10 extra users x $24 (Rs 21,120) + 49,000 MAC overage x $15/100 = $7,350 (Rs 646,800) + Meta Rs 43,155 = ~Rs 735,627/month (in practice, a team this size would likely be pushed to a custom Enterprise quote rather than pay published Advanced-tier overage) |
USD converted at Rs 88 = $1. Respond.io's Starter plan ($79/month, 5 users, unlimited MAC per its own pricing page) is competitive at low volume. Growth ($159/month, 10 users, 1,000 MAC included, $12/100 MAC overage) and Advanced ($279/month, 10 users, $15/100 MAC overage) get materially more expensive once your monthly active contact count climbs past the included allowance, which a marketing-heavy business hits quickly. VGraple CRM's Starter, Growth and Scale plans (Rs 1,499, Rs 3,499, Rs 7,999/month) have no equivalent per-contact overage; Meta's India rate (Rs 0.8631 marketing) is passed through at zero markup either way.
Feature comparison
| Capability | VGraple CRM | Respond.io |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes, no time limit | No, self-serve trial only |
| Entry price | Rs 1,499/month (Starter) | $79/month, Rs 6,952 (Starter) |
| Per-message markup over Meta's rate | None, stated on pricing page | Meta fees billed separately, "not included in any respond.io subscription" |
| Agents included at entry price | 5 | 5 (Starter; $12/month per extra user) |
| Contact-count overage risk | None; fixed monthly conversation limit per plan | Yes, $12 to $15 per 100 MACs beyond plan allowance |
| Shared team inbox | Yes | Yes |
| Instagram DM in same inbox | Yes | Yes |
| Messenger in same inbox | Yes | Yes |
| Telegram, Line, Viber | No | Yes |
| Web chat widget | Yes | Yes |
| Chatbot / flow builder | Yes | Yes |
| AI agent / AI reply suggestions | Yes (Growth and above) | Yes, a dedicated AI Agents product with its own comparison content |
| Knowledge base for AI | Yes | Yes |
| Broadcast pacing (auto speed control) | Yes, documented | Not documented on public pages |
| Daily portfolio budget tracking | Yes, documented | Not documented on public pages |
| Auto-pause on template pause | Yes, documented | Not documented on public pages |
| Suppression of capped/opted-out contacts | Yes, documented | Automated opt-in/opt-out subscription handling confirmed; suppression-vs-failed distinction not confirmed |
| A/B testing on broadcasts | Yes | Not confirmed on broadcast page |
| Template validator | Yes | Not confirmed |
| Template gallery | Yes | Not confirmed |
| Coexistence (Business app + API together) | Yes | Not confirmed |
| Drip sequences | Yes | Not confirmed as a named feature |
| Leads pipeline (CRM) | Yes, on every plan | No |
| Appointments / booking | Yes | Booking automation cited in AI agent case studies; not a dedicated feature |
| Payments in chat | Yes | Not confirmed |
| Revenue attribution | Yes | Case studies cite ROI (42.5x cited) but no documented per-campaign attribution tool |
| Meta Conversions API (CAPI) | Yes | Not confirmed |
| Zapier, REST API and webhooks | Yes | Yes, ~45 integrations listed |
| Android app | Yes | Not confirmed |
| 2FA and audit log | Yes, on every plan | Security/compliance messaging present; specific 2FA/audit log not confirmed |
| Support hours | Email (Starter+), priority (Growth+) | Standard support Starter+; onboarding programme mentioned in FAQ |
Where respond.io is stronger
- Channel breadth. Respond.io covers WhatsApp, Instagram, Messenger, Telegram, Line, Viber, TikTok, SMS and email in one inbox, genuinely wider than VGraple CRM's WhatsApp, Instagram, Messenger and web chat.
- A mature, standalone AI Agents product. Respond.io's AI Agents page runs to roughly 3,500 words with 16 FAQs, four demo videos and a chatbot-vs-AI-agent comparison table, a level of AI product depth VGraple CRM's AI reply suggestions do not match.
- Large, credible customer base and review count. Respond.io cites 10,000+ customers, recognisable enterprise logos (Toyota, McDonald's, British Airways) and holds a 4.8 out of 5 rating from 500+ G2 reviews (checked 26 Aug 2026).
- A large integrations directory. Around 45 integrations are listed on respond.io/integrations, tagged by plan availability, broader than most WhatsApp-focused competitors we reviewed.
- Genuinely deep help centre content. Respond.io's help articles run 3,500 to 4,000 words with step-by-step setup guidance and prompt examples, among the most thorough documentation in this category.
Where VGraple CRM is stronger
- No contact-overage risk. VGraple CRM's plans cap by a flat monthly conversation limit at one price. Respond.io's MAC overage ($12 to $15 per 100 contacts beyond the plan allowance) can multiply the bill several times over at real broadcast volume, as the pricing table above shows.
- A CRM pipeline on every plan. Respond.io has no leads or deals pipeline at all; it is a conversation management platform. VGraple CRM's Kanban pipeline ships on every plan, including Free.
- Delivery protection documented for WhatsApp specifically. Pacing, daily portfolio budget tracking, auto-park on a paused template, and suppression logic tuned to Meta's error codes are all documented VGraple CRM capabilities that respond.io's public pages do not describe in equivalent detail.
- Appointments and payments in chat. Neither is a dedicated, named respond.io feature; VGraple CRM includes both standard.
- A free plan with no time limit. VGraple CRM's Free plan requires no card and never expires. Respond.io has no free tier, only a self-serve trial.
- India-first pricing. VGraple CRM states INR prices directly; respond.io's pricing is USD-only, and its MAC overage can turn an apparently affordable base price into a much larger bill once converted and scaled.
Switching from Respond.io
- Confirm WABA ownership. If your WhatsApp Business Account sits in your own Meta Business Portfolio, which is standard, you can move it directly regardless of respond.io's involvement.
- Reconnect through Meta's Embedded Signup. This is the standard flow for changing Tech Provider; the number's history and quality rating with Meta are unaffected.
- Export your contacts. Respond.io contacts export as a CSV; import into VGraple CRM's contacts module and remap custom fields.
- Recreate templates. Templates belong to the WABA and submitting platform, not respond.io, so rebuild each approved template in VGraple CRM's builder and resubmit for Meta's review.
- Rebuild flows and AI agent logic. Respond.io's flow and AI Agent configurations do not export; recreate qualification and support logic in VGraple CRM's flow builder. If you rely heavily on Telegram, Line or Viber, plan to keep a channel-specific tool for those, since VGraple CRM does not cover them.
- Run a short parallel period. Keep respond.io active in read-only mode while you confirm delivery, inbox and automation behaviour in VGraple CRM before fully switching over.
What reviewers say
Respond.io holds a 4.8 out of 5 rating from 500+ reviews on G2 and a 4.6 out of 5 from 52 reviews on Capterra (94% positive), both checked 26 Aug 2026, among the strongest review profiles of any competitor in this series. Reviewers consistently praise its ability to centralise multiple messaging channels and its ease of use, with a learning curve mentioned as the most common caveat.
VGraple CRM does not yet have a comparable public review count to cite honestly. Respond.io's review strength is real and worth weighing seriously if third-party validation at scale matters to your decision; it is the strongest review profile among the nine competitors covered in this comparison series.